Select Menu
«
Next
Newer Post
»
Previous
Older Post

Can Tottenham afford following Chelsea’s precedent? Levy might be planning to sack Sherwood after a trashing defeat by Manchester City at White Hart Lane .

Looking to Tottenham stumbling to yet another humiliating defeat at the White Hart Lane, anyone could question that Is this the last time we are seeing Tim Sherwood in the dugout against Manchester City as Tottenham manager? Probably YES.

Looking at Daniel Levy’s philosophy to sack managers before even they could respond, one can argue that the MD has seen enough and next season this Assignment will be given to another manager, certainly much younger and experienced than both Villas Boas and Sherwood, that could take Tottenham to the epitome achieved by Harry Redknapp years ago in shape of fourth spot finish in the Premier League.

Can Tottenham afford following Chelsea’s precedent?

Now the Query that are Tottenham taking the Chelsea’s route to success? Looking at Chelsea Roman Abramovich sacked Rafa even after the Europa League victory, and Yes the stance of Rafa supporters look bleak and diminished if you look at Chelsea’s position in the premier league.

So one could argue that this is right, Certainly It Is, Look at the case of Chelsea and Real Madrid, but can you join the elite group of teams mentioned afore simply by changing the managers? Certainly not and if that is the case, than Manchester United’s instance of retaining Sir Alex not in the 80’s but in the 2000’ lean times as well indicates that this theory is not 100% perfect.

Looking at the sacking of managers by Levy, this theory doesn’t seem to faze anyone, sometimes not even his fans.

Harry Redknapp was sacked in the 11-12 season, even after a fourth position finish ahead of Chelsea. Of course that was ruled out by Chelsea’s Champions league triumph. But now, if you ask any Tottenham supporter or maybe even Levy, their main goal is to reach that majestic fourth spot.

That indicates that in one of the two cases Levy administration is wrong, first was when they achieved fourth spot and sacked Redknapp and second is now. Either you just cannot demand fourth position from a manager that has taken reins mid-season, or you cannot sack the manager that has achieved that goal. Probably first example is more tempting.

Now turning to the Chelsea model, yes they have sacked managers, but they have replaced them with world class ones and gave them the budgets that could lure anyone to the Stamford Bridge. The Russian Oil was literally used and success of Chelsea was guaranteed, not just by new managers but also by new PROVEN world class additions to the squad.

Tottenham on the other hand lacks the budget to do the same, they may have spent ludicrously this season, but this epoch hasn’t arrived as a result of any hefty tack over of money grabbing owners, but by the outrageous money made available to the club by the sale of Bale.

Would they ever be able to repeat that, this history shows certainly they can but first they would have to undergo an operation clean out as was the case in 2008-09 season in which they spent more than 100million in transfer, but also earned approximately 78 million by giving out 19 players, including the famous Berbatov deal to Manchester United.


So in order for the new manger (who is likely to join in summer) to succeed, it might be tempting for the Spurs to go in the transfer market again with full zeal, if they not try to extend the contract of Sherwood who has taken the jobs both hands down.


Amir Bashir follow him on Twitter.  

«
Next
Newer Post
»
Previous
Older Post

No comments

Leave a Reply